What Role Does Morality And Ethics Play On Love - 860 Words

What Role does Morality and Ethics Play on Love? Morality has morphed into its own identity over the years and ethics has maintained its connection to love. Morality is the repetition of behaviors such as habits, according to Hugh LaFollette. Ethics is how a person behaves or how they do things based on their moral principles. Noah Elkrief states that love is the ability to be with someone without feeling the need to make judgements; negative or positive about that person. Morality and ethics play an important role on love and relationships, by establishing unsaid rules and understandings between the two lovers involved in the relationship. Ethics is a subcategory of morality, in other words ethics is how one behaves and understands emotions based on their experiences and learnings of morals. Love is a very diverse emotion and a lot of key factors play a role is how one learns how to love and show love. Love is not easily understood or defined but you can start with learning about a person’s mindset on morality and ethics. Morality has a huge impact on the ethics of an individual and how they perceive a relationship. Morality is how a person distinguishes right from wrong. A person’s morality is usually developed throughout their lives and is highly influenced by the way they are raised. The individual’s environment can also play a role in their morality, such as; if they are vastly involved in their community church then they may take the morals they believe from theShow MoreRelated Moral Dilemma Essay1636 Words   |  7 PagesMoral Dilemma As human beings, we are forced to accept the inevitability of being unwillingly confronted with situations that test the strength of our morality and character. In the midst of deep moral conflict we become immensely introspective and we follow our intuition with the hopes of it guiding us towards the morally correct decision. However, how can we be sure that we have acted morally in a situation that is so morbid and perverse that our intuition is completely tornRead MoreEthical Approaches Critique Paper1118 Words   |  5 PagesApproaches XXX XXXUniversity Instructor: XXX Course Name: XXX Date: XXX This paper summarizes each of ethical approaches, especially the Grand Principles, Nash’s Covenantal Business Ethic, Damon’s Four Dimensions of Business Morality, and Hill’s (2008) Christian Ethic for Business. Also, this paper critiques each of them through analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of approaches. Finally, the most favor approach is provided at the end. The Grand Principles whichRead MoreEthics and Worldviews1417 Words   |  6 PagesUniverse Next Door: Ethics and Worldviews A worldview is the set of beliefs that is fundamentally grounded in each person’s heart whether they realize it or not, whether they hold true to it or not. Put simply, it is the basis on which a person lives his/her life. Therefore, ethics, the defining of right and wrong in life, is a crucial aspect of each worldview. Some would say ethics is based on feeling, others would say religious beliefs, while still others would say ethics is based on the lawRead MoreEthics : Ethics And Morality1476 Words   |  6 Pagesuniversal on ethics and morality. Ethics among different cultures is so vast, even though every culture does have a standard for ethics which they live by. Although ethics is a broad human universal, there is no specific universal ethic. Each world religion holds a different ethic as their highest ethic; it is always a case by case basis. Theory: Ethics serve as an adaptive function in modern environment, more than ever. As society evolves, the standard of ethics also increases. Ethics is a traitRead MoreContagion And Gattaca Analysis1498 Words   |  6 PagesIn faces of crises, people may go to any lengths to pursue what they feel is necessary. The films Contagion, directed by Steven Soderbergh in 2010, and GATTACA, directed by Andrew Niccol in 1997, both explore themes of morality in times of crises, whether these crises are of personal nature or affect a widespread population. Both films explore ethical implications of technology as it pertains to scientific development, and in addition weaves in a narrative surrounding various moral decisions regardingRead MoreThe Relationship Between Morality and Religion in the Dalai Lama and John Pope Ii Perspective1609 Words   |  7 PagesThe Relationship Between Morality and Religion In the Dalai Lama and John Pope II Perspective The complexities on the issue of the relationship between religion and morality is intriguing in the sense that there is no right or wrong answer, but merely your own intrinsic belief. The 14th Dalai Lama, spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhists, believes that you cant have religion without morals, but you can have morals without religion. This seems to contrast with the view of John Paul II, in the senseRead MoreAs Clearly And Carefully As You Can1326 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿Voluntarists and non-voluntarists have had intense debate on the issue of religion and morality. The underlying central argument of the debate is whether the morality requires a religious foundation or not. While the voluntarists claim that morality does require a religious foundation, non-voluntarists assert that it doesn’t. David Brink and George Mavrodes argues with this theme of voluntarist and non-voluntarist. My essay will largely focus on the strengths and weakness of both voluntarists andRead Mo reShould We Be A Good Grade?1612 Words   |  7 Pagesthat by doing what is right we are deemed good, but if caught doing something wrong, we are then considered bad. As we grow older however, the black and white of wrong and right becomes more and more grey, and harder to depict between. Is this wrong if the outcome benefits so many? How can I be doing the right thing when I’m just hurting someone in the end? Most of time these questions are answered based on beliefs: morals. Should I cheat on this test in order to get a good grade? What if I didn’tRead MoreMoral Reasoning And Ethical Decision Making1144 Words   |  5 PagesThese theories are used to assist people in deciding between the right and wrong acts. One of these theories is the virtue ethics, which is used to determine whether an act is virtuous or vicious. David Hume and Aristotle were among the first philosophers to use virtue ethics to differentiate between virtues and vices. According to Hume, an act is virtuous if it represents what a virtuous person would characteristically do in the same circumstances. Basically, it means that a virtuous act must be approvedRead MoreMoral Justification in Greatest Happiness Principle1124 Words   |  5 Pagesto the most amounts of people. According to John Stuart Mill this is an acceptable foundation for morality but is it really? Truly this isn’t that great of a foundation for morality, one person cannot assume that his or her actions will result in happiness other people. This is because one people associate different meanings to their individual happiness. Also this is an unstable foundation for morality because we cannot see every consequence for our actions as soon as they take place. There sure are

The Ethics and Diversity Issues in Organization Term Paper

Essays on The Ethics and Diversity Issues in Organization Term Paper 1. Diversity in the workplace represents an overall need and requirement for equity, legality, fairness, and efficiency. Yet, it must be understood that diversity is not merely a compliance issue. Accordingly, the three main determinants of diversity and the means through which they can benefit a given organization are with regards to the overall level of increased efficiency that a diverse organization can benefit from, the added potential of integrating with the needs of an increasingly diverse consumer base, and seeking to make a given organization/firm/entity representative of the general society and/or population within a given region. Each of these benefits and/or takeaways from the article that was presented have little if any relationship to legality issues. Seeking to specify this point strongly is extremely important due to the fact that so many stakeholders view legality as the primary â€Å"check in the box† that they must engage in order to fulfill a given diversi ty requirement. However, as has been presented, diverse city in and of itself has a litany of tangential benefits that do not have anything to do with the overall level of legal requirements that may define or constrain it. For instance, by engaging with a diverse group of individuals within the workforce, and seeking to ensure that diversity is represented at every juncture of an organization, the overall level of representativeness that the organization can have will greatly be maximized. Within the current environment, it is of the utmost importance to ensure that the firm/organization/business entity is fully able to speak to the specific needs of its consumers. As such, having a workforce that is diverse and representatives of this consumer base is not only good business practice, it also promotes a greater level of understanding between the consumer and the service/good provider/producer. A related but dissimilar level of benefit can of course be had with respect to making a firm representative of the general community and/or region that they serve. This not only as a benefit with regards to the fact that the firm clearly exhibits a commitment to hiring available talent within the workforce, it also has to do with the way in which stakeholder and community buy-in occurs. If a given firm/entity is viewed as one that is not diverse and ultimately will share little if any interest in seeking to promote diversity within the region, it is not only likely that consumers of the end good/service will be turned away, available talent will also be discouraged from applying to this particular entity. A final determinant that must be noted is with respect to the overall diversity of viewpoints that would be engaged within a firm that prizes diversity as one of its primary goals. Diversity is oftentimes viewed in a one dimensional framework. What is meant by this is that diversity is seen as something that can only be defined with respect to age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, level of disability, or any other number of constraining and/or defining characteristics. However, diversity is much more than it merely a listing of apparent life decisions, levels of ability, and/or ethnicity or religious views. Instead, seeking to foster diversity has a direct and indirect level of benefit with respect to the way in which teams and work groups can seek to solve different issues. For instance, if a firm that represents an overall lack of diversity seeks to integrate with a specific problem, the overall effectiveness of its solutions will be in question due to the fact that it has not engaged a diverse group of individuals in seeking to solve these issues. Naturally, this is not to state that a firm that engages and diversity is effectively much better in problem solving; rather, it merely delineates the fact that such groups are much more likely to bring alternative viewpoints and additional understanding to situations that might not otherwise be understood in the same light. 2. With respect to creating an action plan for seeking to eliminate the problems that exist within a given organization that suffers from a lack of diversity, it must be understood that this process cannot take place overnight. Rather, seeking to establish a healthier culture and one that places an emphasis upon the degree and extent to which diversity can be leveraged as an asset and not a requirement must take time. Within such an understanding, fostering diversity is a multi step process that begins with a clear delineation of focus amongst all of the team members and component parts of the organization/entity in question. All too often, firms throughout the world seek to engage a new culture merely by briefing upper management with regards to the way in which changes should be delineated within their respective departments. Although it is useful for these briefings to be made and upper management to be keenly and fully aware of the organizational and cultural changes that an organiz ation/business entity seeks to engage, seeking to perform these merely by delineating tasks and impressing upon management a new focus. Accordingly, in order for a cultural change to be noted, it is most oftentimes necessary for the human resources department to become intimately involved in seeking to promote this change through the offering of standardized and/or optional learning sessions to define the way in which the firm should seek to grow and develop in the near future. Although it is sometimes dangerous, seeking to point out the failures of the past as a means of defining and delineating a new culture is oftentimes one of the best ways in which a firm or organization can seek to impress upon the stakeholders the importance of pursuing a new path. Although many firms might like to retain an element of omniscience, admitting to the stakeholders that the previous method of operation and culture was an ineffective means of continuing to further and promote profit and/or development of the business product is a useful and helpful way to engage with the necessity of changing cultural interpretations and including a higher degree of diversity. That actionable means through which diversity can be maximized within a given firm/entity is with regards to leading by example. If the CEO/director of the organization engages with a cultural approach that promotes diversity and seeks to choose potential hires based upon the level of diversity that they represent, this cultural approach to an alternative model will soon begin to resonate throughout the rest of the firm. As such, seeking to engage the human resources department forcing diversity upon the mid-level management and decision-makers oftentimes backfires whereas an approach that is more amenable to leveraging the degree of respect that stakeholders oftentimes associate with the decisions of a manager, the degree of likelihood that an increased focus upon the importance of diversity will be represented is increased dramatically. Although there is a litany of best practices that can be engaged with respect to seeking to foster a culture of diversity, it must be understood th at no single approach in and of itself is sufficient. Rather, it is the responsibility of the respective human resources department, and stakeholders within the decision making structure of the organization, to ensure that diversity is leveraged in a multitude of different ways. Through such an approach, the needs of each of the representative sectors of the organization can come to a more informed understanding with regards to how a greater degree of diversity can benefit them in the long run; not only provide a check in the box to requirements of other sorts.

Hamlet Tragism (888 words) Essay Example For Students

Hamlet Tragism (888 words) Essay Hamlet TragismArguably, the best piece of writing ever done by William Shakespeare, Hamlet isthe classic example of a tragedy. In all tragedies the hero suffers, and usuallydies at the end. Othello stabs himself, Romeo and Juliet commit suicide, Brutisfalls on his sword, and like them Hamlet dies by getting cut with a poisontipped sword. But that is not all tht is need to consider a play a tragedy, andsometimes a hero doesnt even need to die. Not every play in which a hero diesis considered a tragedy. There are more elements needed to label a play one. Probably the most important element is an amount of free will. In every tragedy,the characters must display some. If every action is controlled by a herosdestiny, then the heros death cant be avoided, and in a tragedy the sad partis tht it could. Hamlets death could have been avoided many times. Hamlet hadmany opportunities to kill Claudius, but didnt take advantage of them. He alsohad the option of making his claim public, but instead he chose not too. Atragic hero doesnt need to be good. For example, MacBeth was evil, yet he was atragic hero, because he had free will. He also had only one flaw, and that waspride. He had many good traits such as bravery, but his one bad trait made himevil. Also a tragic hero doesnt have to die. While in all Shakespeareantragedies, the hero dies, in others he may live but suffer oralDestruction In Oedipus Rex, the proud yet morally blind king pluckshis eyes out, and has to spend his remaining days as a wandering, sightlessbeggar, guided at every pain ful step by his daughter, Antigone. A misconceptionabout tragedies is that nothing good comes out of them, but it is actually theopposite. In Romeo and Juliet, although both die, they end the feud between theCapulets and the Montegues. Also, Romeo and Juliet can be together in heaven. InHamlet, although Hamlet dies, it is almost the best. How could he have anypleasure during the rest of his life, with his parents and Ophelia dead. Also,although Hamlet dies, he is able to kill Claudius and get rid of the evil rulingof the throne. Every tragic play must have a tragic hero. The tragic hero mustpossess many good traits, as well as one flaw, which eventually leads to hisdownfall. A tragic hero must be brave and noble. In Othello, Othello had onefatal flaw, he was too great. Othello was too brave, too noble, and especiallytoo proud to allow himself to be led back to Venice in chains. A tragic heromust not back down from his position. He also had to have free will, in order tostand up for what he believes in. Finally, the audience must have some sympathyfor the tragic hero. In Macbeth, although MacBeth commits many murders, onealmost feels sorry for him and his fate. Hamlet is the perfect example of thetragic hero. Hamlet has all the good traits needed to be a tragic hero. He isbrave and daring. One example of this is that when he went to England, he wastaking a big risk. If his plan didnt work, he would have been executed. He alsois loyal. His loyalty to his father, was the reason he was so angry at Claudiusand his mother. Another trait was that he was intelligent. He was able to thinkup the idea of faking insanity, in order to get more information about Claudius. But Hamlet like all other tragic heros had a flaw. He couldnt get around todoing anything, because he couldnt move on. He was a full grown adult, yet hestill attended school in England, because he couldnt move on. Also, it took hima long time to stop grieving about his father, because he didnt want to movepast that party of his life. And after he finally did, Hamlet couldnt getaround to killing Claudius. He kept pretending he was insane even after he wassure that Claudius killed his father. The final example of Hamlets inability toget around to do anything was that he w as dating Ophelia for a long time, butnever got around to marrying her. The audience was able to feel sympathy forHamlet too. He had just lost his father, and his mother remarried so quicklythat according to him they could have used the leftover food from the funeral inthe wedding reception. Also, the audience could feel that Hamlet loved hisparents and this sudden change was hurting him. In any tragedy, there is atra gic hero, and he must possess certain characteristics in order to be one. Hemust have many good traits such as loyalty and bravery, but one bad one such aspride. Also the audience must have sympathy for the hero. A tragic hero alsomust have free will or his fate would be decided for him. And his death couldhave been avoided. Finally, the audience must have sympathy for the tragic hero,or it w ouldnt seem so tragic. Hamlet is a perfect example of a tragic hero. Hewas brave, loyal, and intelligent, but he couldnt move past one thing, whichlet to his death. HE had a choice of how he would deal with Claudius, and likeother tragic heros he made a decision. Also, the audience was able to feelsympathy for the position Hamlet was in. These attributes made Hamlet theperfect example of a tragic hero.

Soap History Essays - Chemistry, Cleaning, Hygiene, Personal Life

Soap History Most people washed themselves with only one essential thing at the time, water. This, of course, happened until the development of soap in 2800 B.C. The soap was found in clay cylinders during the excavation of ancient Babylon. There were inscriptions discovered on the cylinders, which showed us that fats were boiled with ashes, which was the method of making the soap at this time. Records have shown that Egyptians bathed regularly. There was a medical document found called "The Ebers Papyrus" which described the combining of animal and vegetable oils with alkaline salts to form soap-like material. These were used for treating skin diseases and washing. At around this time, Moses gave the Israelites specific laws about personal cleanliness. He related cleanliness to health and religious cleansing. The early Greeks bathed for artistic reasons. Instead of washing with soap, they bathed themselves with blocks of clay, sand, pumice, and ashes. Then they anointed themselves with oil and scraped off the oil and dirt with a strigil. They washed their clothes in the streams without using soap. According to an ancient Roman legend, soap got its name from Mount Sapo where animals were sacrificed. When it had rain, the water washed away the animal fat and wood ashes down into the clay soil along the Tiber River. Women had found this clay mixture and it made their wash much cleaner. Soap making was a popular craft in Europe by the 17th century. Vegetable and animal oils were used with ashes of plants and fragrance. More varities of soap gradually became available for shaving and washing hair, as well as bathing and washing clothes. Italy, Spain, and France were the early centers of soap manufacturing. The English began making soap during the 12th century. The chemistry of the soap manufacturing stayed the same until 1916 when the first synthetic detergent was developed in Germany. Synthetic detergents are non-soap washing and cleaning products that are "synthesized". Household detergent products became known in the United States around the 1930s. It is very important to understand the basic knowledge of soap and detergent chemistry. Water has a property called surface tension. In water, other water molecules surround each molecule, but at the surface, other water molecules only on the waterside surround those molecules. A tension is created as the surface molecules are pulled into the body of water. This tension causes the water to "bead up" on the surface, which slows down the cleaning process. During the cleaning process, surface tension must be reduced so the water can spread and wet surfaces. Chemicals that do this are called surface-active agents. The surface-active agents perform many important jobs in cleaning. They are classified by their ionic properties in water. These properties are anionic which means a negative charge, nonionic which means no charge, cationic which means having a positive charge, and amphoteric which means having either a positive or negative charge. Soaps are water-soluble sodium or potassium salts of fatty acids. The fats and oils used in soap making are made up of a unique mixture of several different triglycerides. In a triglyceride molecule, 3 fatty acid molecules are attached to one molecule of glycerine. Fatty acids are the mechanism of fats and oils that are used in soap. They are weak acids of two parts, which are a carboxylic acid group and a hydrocarbon chain attached to the carboxylic acid group.